Last weekend, I talked to Noam Elkies about elliptic curves and a problem that we were working on. We reached the topic of the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture (which is a Millenium problem). Just for posterity, let me recall what the conjecture is about. Let be an elliptic curve over a number field , and let denote the group of -rational points of .

**Theorem (Mordell-Weil):** *The group is finitely generated. In other words, . The integer is called the *rank* **of .*

For example, a number is congruent if and only if the rank of the elliptic curve is positive. For simplicity, we will now work over . There is a remarkable result by Mazur:

**Theorem (Mazur):** *If is an elliptic curve over , the torsion group is either for some or for .*

(Over a general number field of dimension over , Merel proved that the size of the torsion group is bounded by some constant .) This is an incredible theorem, and tells us about the structure of for an elliptic curve . But what about the rank? Are there any special properties of the rank? There’s a conjecture known as the rank conjecture:

**The rank conjecture: **

*The rank of can be arbitrarily large.*

That doesn’t really help us much, though, so we ask: is there a way of determining the rank of a general curve? This is the content of the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer (BSD) conjecture (still over number fields!).

Recall the zeta function of an elliptic curve over , where denotes the reduction of mod a prime (ignoring what happens when where is the discriminant of ), defined as . By the Weil conjecture, this is a rational function in , and it turns out that the exact form of as a rational function in is as , where is . Now define . The *-function* of is defined as the product over the over all primes not dividing (called “good primes”); more precisely, .

This is a function in , and converges for . Hasse conjectured that this could be analytically continued to the whole complex plane, and this is proved. Let’s look at when . This gives us . Wait! Recall that . Thus, is , and . Now, the -function of is a product over all good primes, so you’d expect to tell us *something* about the rank of . Indeed, that’s what the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture states:

**Conjecture (BSD):** *The order of vanishing of when is the rank of . In other words, the Taylor expansion of must be .*

(There’s an explicit formula for when you factor in the “bad primes” as well.) As mentioned above, all of this makes sense for number fields as well (we just chose because in that case one can state the exact classification of the torsion subgroups of ). When you’re asking questions over number fields, a very natural question to ask is what happens to the same question over function fields (which, recall, are finite-dimensional field extensions of ).

Let be a smooth connected projective curve over , and let be an elliptic curve over . The conductor of is the product over all places of the ideals where is if has good reduction at (so the conductor measures bad reduction), if has multiplicative reduction at , and if has additive reduction at . It turns out that the Mordell-Weil conjecture and rank conjecture hold true in this (i.e., the function field) context! This is really cool, so we can ask: does the analogue of the BSD conjecture hold in the function field case? But what *is* the -function? The -function in this case is defined as follows, where is the cardinality of the residue field , and is, like before, :

This function converges absolutely for , and can be meromorphically continued onto the complex plane. What we’re going to do next by relating it to the BSD conjecture seems quite obvious; indeed, the BSD over function fields says that the rank of is the order of vanishing of at . There’s a remarkable result by Artin and Tate; in order to state this, we need to introduce one more definition.

Recall the Hasse principle basically says that certain equations have solutions in the rationals if they have solutions in all completions of (where, recall, there are only two norms on . But this does not work in all cases, and so we need something to measure its failure – this, in the case of elliptic curves (and abelian varieties in general, but we won’t go there), is called the *Tate-Shafarevich group*. Precisely, let be a perfect field, and define to be the cohomology group . Define the Tate-Shafarevich group (which refuses to compile in WordPress LaTeX, so I use the older notation; the more modern notation is “Ш(E/K)”) as the kernel of the map . We may now state Artin-Tate’s result:

**Theorem (Artin-Tate):** *The BSD conjecture holds for over if and only if is finite.*

This is an incredibly awesome result, which hints at us that BSD might be true in the number field case! The way this is proved is very cool; you consider the elliptic surface over attached to , which is the smooth proper surface with a flat morphism to with fiber , and then use work of Grothendieck on -functions to complete the proof. In the notes I have of my conversation with Elkies, I have Elkies’ drawing of such an elliptic surface. Now, the Neron-Severi group is isomorphic to the direct sum of and some other groups; based on this, Artin and Tate formulated a more general conjecture relating the rank of the Neron-Severi group of the elliptic surface used in the proof and some other groups telling us algebraic information about the elliptic surface and its zeta function. (I refer you to this link for more information on the Artin-Tate conjecture.)

SKD