The Yoneda Lemma

Hi all! I realized I hadn’t talked about one of the most basic topics in category theory, which has been implicitly used in many of my posts, namely, the Yoneda Lemma. I’ll do so in this brief post.

If \mathscr{C} is a category, then the Yoneda lemma says that the canonical functor C\mapsto \mathrm{Hom}(-,C) is fully faithful. What is this functor? Any map f:C\to D induces a map \mathrm{Hom}(-C)\to \mathrm{Hom}(-,D) by taking any map C^\prime\to C to C^\prime\to C\xrightarrow{f} D. The Yoneda lemma is the following statement.

Yoneda lemma: Let X:\mathscr{C}^{op}\to \mathbf{Set} be a functor. There’s an isomorphism \mathrm{Map}_{\mathrm{Fun}(\mathscr{C}^{op},\mathbf{Set})}(\mathrm{Hom}(-,C),X)\simeq X(C).

How do we prove this? Consider a natural transformation \eta:\mathrm{Hom}(-,C)\to X, and consider a functor f:B\to C. This induces maps \mathrm{Hom}(C,C)\to \mathrm{Hom}(B,C), and maps X(C)\to X(B), and there’s a commutative diagram:

ql_8d8879f3df619c6f1babc9e3bed8a4f0_l3

Now, let’s consider what happens to the identity map \mathrm{id}_C under this whole thing. We get:ql_fc5c40fca92b01f1a1e1975285f82547_l3

However, because of commutativity, \eta_b(f) = (X(f))(\eta_c(\mathrm{id}_C)). So the transformation \eta is determined by the map f. We therefore get the isomorphism in \mathscr{C} given simply by taking \mathrm{Map}_{\mathrm{Fun}(\mathscr{C}^{op},\mathbf{Set})}(\mathrm{Hom}(-,C),X) to \mathrm{Map}_{\mathrm{Fun}(\mathscr{C}^{op},\mathbf{Set})}(\mathrm{Hom}(C,C),X(C)), and then evaluating on \mathrm{id}_C. This gives X(C), so we’re done!

The point of this result is that it makes precise the awesome philosophy of category theory that the properties of objects are determined by maps into that object. (There’s also a Yoneda lemma for higher categories, which states that if X is a simplicial set, then the Yoneda embedding X\to \mathscr{P}(X) is fully faithful.) Some examples of the Yoneda lemma in “real life” include the following (a very inexhaustive list):

  1. In simplicial sets: if S is a simplicial set, then \mathrm{Hom}(\Delta^n,S) is simply S_n. This follows from the Yoneda lemma since \Delta^n is the functor \mathrm{Hom}(-,[n]).
  2. In algebraic topology: (singular, say) the n-th cohomology group with coefficients in a group G is, by Brown representability, simply \mathrm{Hom}(-,K(G,n)). Therefore, natural transformations \mathrm{H}^n(-,X)\to \mathrm{H}^m(-X) are maps \mathrm{Hom}(-,K(G,n))\to\mathrm{Hom}(-,K(G,m)), or, by the Yoneda lemma, maps K(G,n)\to K(G,m). These are called cohomology operations.
  3. If you’ve got a Hopf algebra, then its prime spectrum gives you an affine group scheme.

In general, the moral is that representing objects are unique up to isomorphism which could have similar structures as the functor. I hope this was fun!

Best,
SKD

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s